P20.04002
Seminar of Research Result
| No | Module name | Seminar of Research Result | ||||
| 1 | Courses code | P20.04002 | ||||
| 2 | Study loads | 2 credits | ||||
| 3 | Semester | Fourth Semester | ||||
| 4 | Precondition | a. Registered as active students b. Student has conducted a research proposal seminar and passed c. Enrolled in the Progress Report course (1 or 2) |
||||
| 5 | Competence | Progress Report Seminar is held to assess the Masters students thesis research progress, students are expected to be able to: β Present the ability to interpret and analyze data β Deliver information orally in an organized, persuasive, and logical manner using documentation and supporting visual aids β Take, analyze, and interpret scientific literature to provide information to be shared orally or in writing β Creating documents that are technical, analytical, relevant in content and well managed β Show contributions both in individual or group project β Conduct independent literature studies using databases and pharmacology-related publications to solve problems related to the field of pharmacology β Analyze, interpret, criticize scientific literature related to study design, interpretation data and suitability of conclusions |
||||
| 6 | Elements of competency | MKB, MKK | ||||
| 7 | Type competency | main competence | ||||
| 8 | Syllabus | The Student should have research proposal manuscripts that have been wrapped in yellow soft cover | ||||
| 9 | Attribute to soft skills | communication skill | ||||
| 10 | Learning methods | an open seminar that can be attended by students and lecturers. Technical implementation: The students present their research proposal for 15 minutes followed by a question and answer session by discussants, each discussant is given 10 minutes to ask questions |
||||
| 11 | Learning media | the LCD viewer, laptop, white board and “online” (Google Meet) | ||||
| 12 | Appraisal | discussants evaluate the accountability of students for questions that are critical and clarify towards the topics with percentage scoring: β Significance of background research and/or research focus and Objectives, 15% (fifteen percent); β Relevance and updating of literature review, 25% (twenty five percent); β Accuracy of the objectives and research proportion/hypothesis, 10% (ten percent); β Suitability of research methods, 10% (ten percent); β Scientific writing ability, 20% (twenty percent); β Communication ability in oral exam, 20% (twenty percent); β Total 100% (one hundred percent) can be added with assessment 10% (ten percent). β The score of discussants is added up with other discussants score with ratio 60% of adviser team, 40% of examiner team as final score, without converting into grade in advanced. Final Score: β Students are declared βPASSβ if they get an average score of β₯ 68 β Students are declared βNOT PASSβ if they get an average score of < 68 β Converting FS into Grade and Score using the following guidelines: |
||||
| Final Score (FS) | Grade | Score | ||||
| 80 β€ FS β€ 100 | A | 4 | ||||
| 68 β€ FS < 80 | B | 3 | ||||
| 56 β€ FS < 68 | C | 2 | ||||
| 45 β€ FS < 56 | D | 1 | ||||
| FS < 45 | E | 0 | ||||
| 13 | Lecturer | Thesis adviser team and examiner team | ||||
| 14 | References | Unpad Rector Regulation No. 50 of 2016 concerning Guidelines for Masters and Doctoral Education in the Padjadjaran University Environment Academic Guidelines for Masterβs Program in Pharmacy |
||||
