P20.04002
Seminar of Research Result
No | Module name | Seminar of Research Result | ||||
1 | Courses code | P20.04002 | ||||
2 | Study loads | 2 credits | ||||
3 | Semester | Fourth Semester | ||||
4 | Precondition | a. Registered as active students b. Student has conducted a research proposal seminar and passed c. Enrolled in the Progress Report course (1 or 2) |
||||
5 | Competence | Progress Report Seminar is held to assess the Masters students thesis research progress, students are expected to be able to: ● Present the ability to interpret and analyze data ● Deliver information orally in an organized, persuasive, and logical manner using documentation and supporting visual aids ● Take, analyze, and interpret scientific literature to provide information to be shared orally or in writing ● Creating documents that are technical, analytical, relevant in content and well managed ● Show contributions both in individual or group project ● Conduct independent literature studies using databases and pharmacology-related publications to solve problems related to the field of pharmacology ● Analyze, interpret, criticize scientific literature related to study design, interpretation data and suitability of conclusions |
||||
6 | Elements of competency | MKB, MKK | ||||
7 | Type competency | main competence | ||||
8 | Syllabus | The Student should have research proposal manuscripts that have been wrapped in yellow soft cover | ||||
9 | Attribute to soft skills | communication skill | ||||
10 | Learning methods | an open seminar that can be attended by students and lecturers. Technical implementation: The students present their research proposal for 15 minutes followed by a question and answer session by discussants, each discussant is given 10 minutes to ask questions |
||||
11 | Learning media | the LCD viewer, laptop, white board and “online” (Google Meet) | ||||
12 | Appraisal | discussants evaluate the accountability of students for questions that are critical and clarify towards the topics with percentage scoring: ● Significance of background research and/or research focus and Objectives, 15% (fifteen percent); ● Relevance and updating of literature review, 25% (twenty five percent); ● Accuracy of the objectives and research proportion/hypothesis, 10% (ten percent); ● Suitability of research methods, 10% (ten percent); ● Scientific writing ability, 20% (twenty percent); ● Communication ability in oral exam, 20% (twenty percent); ● Total 100% (one hundred percent) can be added with assessment 10% (ten percent). ● The score of discussants is added up with other discussants score with ratio 60% of adviser team, 40% of examiner team as final score, without converting into grade in advanced. Final Score: ● Students are declared “PASS” if they get an average score of ≥ 68 ● Students are declared “NOT PASS” if they get an average score of < 68 ● Converting FS into Grade and Score using the following guidelines: |
||||
Final Score (FS) | Grade | Score | ||||
80 ≤ FS ≤ 100 | A | 4 | ||||
68 ≤ FS < 80 | B | 3 | ||||
56 ≤ FS < 68 | C | 2 | ||||
45 ≤ FS < 56 | D | 1 | ||||
FS < 45 | E | 0 | ||||
13 | Lecturer | Thesis adviser team and examiner team | ||||
14 | References | Unpad Rector Regulation No. 50 of 2016 concerning Guidelines for Masters and Doctoral Education in the Padjadjaran University Environment Academic Guidelines for Master’s Program in Pharmacy |